Really excited to start recording some demos. In the past, it has always been “fit as much as you can into this tiny time frame because we only have enough money for four hours of studio time.” Now, with home recording, time isn’t as much of an issue, which is great. I currently have 12 songs I am interested in recording (I believe 3 of those are current works-in-process).
I’ve had this idea for a song in my head (it is actually a re-recording of a song I had recorded with Pudding & Fruit back in 1994). I always thought it could use a better, more energetic recording – some additional sounds, distortion, etc. So, I plan to re-record the song. Lately, I’ve been playing the song clean on my acoustic guitar and am really liking it. It hit me. With home recording, I can go ahead and record different versions of the songs because I’m not as pressed for time. I can record an electric version, as well as an acoustic version of the songs. If I’m debating between taking a song in a couple different directions, I can go ahead and take the time to do both – I don’t have to decide before the recording. I don’t know why that lightbulb didn’t go off before.
With Pudding & Fruit, my regret is the speed with which we recorded. In hindsight, I wish we would’ve maybe done some home recording demos or something and really worked on the songs. Maybe do a song or two at a time but make them really good instead of being satisfied that this version only had 5 mistakes or shrugging because only a handful of people will probably know I mispronounced that word (I cringed when I heard myself say Gee-ya instead of Hee-la in regards to the Giant Gila Monster in the song “Sci Fi Movie” but didn’t think it was worth the time to overdub it). I understand we were young, and, for all we knew, each time we recorded could’ve been the last time cuz who knows if we would ever scrape enough money together for another session. I am proud of the CD we made, but I think limiting the songs (we did 15 in total) would have been a good idea and really worked on making them great. There’s not a song on there that I don’t like. Still, maybe we should’ve knocked it down to 8 – 10 songs and made it really solid (could’ve kept the other songs in reserve).
I don’t know. I’m just really excited to go through the process again and making sure I’m satisfied with the end product. No need to rush….
Name Change?
Every once in a while, I wonder if I should change the band name. I have my days where I’m just not too sure about it. I was originally going to do the project under Musicians Anonymous Cleveland (I thought that would work since I figured it may be a revolving door of musicians). I put Cleveland on it just because I figured someone else was already using the name somewhere (although I couldn’t find anything on Google or iTunes). And, if people liked the idea, they could put their own city name at the end – and we could be different chapters. Any thoughts? Or, maybe an unspoken third option?
Here’s an idea for the Musicians Anonymous logo:




